The “God of the gaps” argument is a theological concept suggesting that scientific knowledge gaps are evidence of God’s existence. It’s based on the idea that God must be the explanation when science can’t explain something.
I don’t see anything wrong with a God of the Gaps argument.
Religion has always existed to explain the unexplainable. And since there will always be the unexplainable, there will always be religion.
Actually, my argument is that God created things with multiple truths. Light, for example. Or how about a magnet. A magnet has both a south pole and a north pole. It has a duality.
Many things have multiple truths.
The idea that everything can always be reduced to a single truth dates back through history, ending with Newton and Einstein.
The problem is that many people believe peace and stability can only be achieved if there is only ONE truth. Otherwise, they believe there will be chaos.
I disagree.
I believe a thing can have many truths. And I believe God actually created it that way.
God has given us the tools to finally understand this multi-truth universe.